Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

tj rear leaf conversion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    yeah cheap and simple to build. upgrade 4 link instead of taking two steps back
    SMITH BUILT PERIOD

    Comment


    • #17
      I will say that aside from having crappy leaf packs to start with, I've had no issues from the rear(I do run a traction bar though)... whereas up front I've had to do the following:

      -Replace every single one of my joints at least once(I went with Ballistic joints first time around. Never again, they build bull**** and they have poor company ethics and you'll be lucky to ever get your stuff)... now running Ruffstuff 1.25" heims without issue.
      -My bumpstops that I used actually had one stretch over the factory bump mount which kinda sucks. Not a big deal though, $60 IIRC at Jegs.
      -I have LH/RH threads on my lower links and upper link... I've caught them trying to come loose a couple times. Check things regularly... if not then drive in the snow and make sure they get rusted in place... not coming loose now


      The primary reason I did leafs the first time is that they're simple(backed up by the fact that I had the rear mocked up and done within a week or so... vs several weeks for the linked front), I didn't have to cut the frame at the hump(I was pretty nervous about doing this with a 110v welder), and frankly I really like the look of the shackles out back.


      FWIW Brad Kilby has a leaf sprung rear TJ and it evidently works pretty well.

      http://www.jeepaholics.com/feature/0009/0009.htm

      If you want some inspiration, look up on Pirate for stuff involving "Covered Wagon 4x4" or something to that effect... it's nothing but a group of badass leaf sprung vehicles.

      Well set up leaves will work way better than poorly set up links. That said you'll probably spend close to as much $$ finding out what makes your leaves work well as you would in up front costs for all the joints/tubing/threaded inserts/coil springs and in the end you need to buy good shocks no matter which setup you go with.

      One thing that bugs me about my leaves is that one of the front spring hangers is about 1/4" further forward than the other, so sitting on flat ground the right side is lower than the left. It also affects spring rate because of the (very) slight difference in shackle angle. It's a relatively easy fix, but I'm going to fix it by just cutting the whole Jeep up again... this time new motor and everything

      edit: If you want to come check out my Jeep in person/go for a ride just send me a PM.

      Comment


      • #18
        So it seems like the consensus is to just stay with the 4 link I already have and just make them longer. Better start gathering a parts list then.
        If you don't want it broke, don't let me drive it....

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by flatlander757 View Post
          I did it with Old Man Emu XJ leaves.

          http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=768019

          If you decide to do it, but good leaves from the start. It rides so much better with these leaves it's silly. Flexes plenty well too.

          That said, if you can swing it then go 4-link with coils and shocks w/ an anti-roll bar.

          My Jeep will be getting torn down some time in the near future to cut the tub in half and redo everything basically. Downsizing to 37s or 38s, Toyota Landcruiser axles, trying to drop it down to around 3000lbs, etc etc. I'm going to be 4 linking the rear, probably another 3-link up front this time too though but with coilovers hopefully at all 4 corners but we'll see....

          Point being if you plan on doing this, I may have my entire setup for you to buy off of me, bumper, leaves and all.





          This is the closest to a sidehill pic I've got:



          Roughly 12" of stretch, here's a pic to get an idea of the overhang in the rear. With the new leaves it's a bit of a better angle though(replaced because my bastards packs blew ass).

          fj60 in the front and fj80 FF in the rear ?
          sigpic
          chris hodges
          96 fzj80 3x locked, 4"lift, 37s, homebrew sliders and bumpers,a work in progress
          71 fj55, SOA, locked...The jungle bus... retired

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by gothodgie View Post
            fj60 in the front and fj80 FF in the rear ?
            Why are you always thinking about things "in the rear"?
            One Country, One Flag, One Language...
            LIKE IT OR LEAVE IT!!!

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by flatlander757 View Post
              I will say that aside from having crappy leaf packs to start with, I've had no issues from the rear(I do run a traction bar though)... whereas up front I've had to do the following:

              -Replace every single one of my joints at least once(I went with Ballistic joints first time around. Never again, they build bull**** and they have poor company ethics and you'll be lucky to ever get your stuff)... now running Ruffstuff 1.25" heims without issue.
              -My bumpstops that I used actually had one stretch over the factory bump mount which kinda sucks. Not a big deal though, $60 IIRC at Jegs.
              -I have LH/RH threads on my lower links and upper link... I've caught them trying to come loose a couple times. Check things regularly... if not then drive in the snow and make sure they get rusted in place... not coming loose now


              The primary reason I did leafs the first time is that they're simple(backed up by the fact that I had the rear mocked up and done within a week or so... vs several weeks for the linked front), I didn't have to cut the frame at the hump(I was pretty nervous about doing this with a 110v welder), and frankly I really like the look of the shackles out back.


              FWIW Brad Kilby has a leaf sprung rear TJ and it evidently works pretty well.

              http://www.jeepaholics.com/feature/0009/0009.htm

              If you want some inspiration, look up on Pirate for stuff involving "Covered Wagon 4x4" or something to that effect... it's nothing but a group of badass leaf sprung vehicles.

              Well set up leaves will work way better than poorly set up links. That said you'll probably spend close to as much $$ finding out what makes your leaves work well as you would in up front costs for all the joints/tubing/threaded inserts/coil springs and in the end you need to buy good shocks no matter which setup you go with.

              One thing that bugs me about my leaves is that one of the front spring hangers is about 1/4" further forward than the other, so sitting on flat ground the right side is lower than the left. It also affects spring rate because of the (very) slight difference in shackle angle. It's a relatively easy fix, but I'm going to fix it by just cutting the whole Jeep up again... this time new motor and everything

              edit: If you want to come check out my Jeep in person/go for a ride just send me a PM.
              If the leafs work so well, why are you switching it back to 4 link? The whole thing just seems simple and easy to me with the results I'm after. The rear doesn't flex much now with the sway bar on it. It looked cheaper to leaf it than buy all the rod ends and brackets and such..... but I've never designed anything before either
              If you don't want it broke, don't let me drive it....

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by twiztedzuki View Post
                yeah instead of link suspension , id go leaves and revolver shackles, that b badass getup!
                So are you for or against? You've said both s:confused:ides.....
                If you don't want it broke, don't let me drive it....

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by gothodgie View Post
                  fj60 in the front and fj80 FF in the rear ?
                  Sort of... I'm up in the air about a HP8" vs LP 9.5" front center section... but planning on the LP 9.5" center in the rear. I'm planning on running ARBs broached out to 35 spline in the rear(maybe up front, unsure as of now)... but wanting to build my own home-made knuckles kind of like Spidertrax, but I'm going to use the lower kingpin bearing from D60s top and bottom(so the bearings will need shimmed, but no spring and bushing to wear out up top) and build it to accept a Chevy 6 lug 33 spline IFS unit bearing up front. In the back since I want 35 spline, factory Toyota FF housing will not work. So it will either be semi float or I'll build it to accept redrilled F350 unit bearings(damn $$) or some 6 lug D60 hubs. Semi float is tempting since it's the lightest which is a major goal of mine. Ruff Stuff housings front and rear too.

                  Originally posted by tjrider View Post
                  If the leafs work so well, why are you switching it back to 4 link? The whole thing just seems simple and easy to me with the results I'm after. The rear doesn't flex much now with the sway bar on it. It looked cheaper to leaf it than buy all the rod ends and brackets and such..... but I've never designed anything before either
                  Lighter, better departure angle, better for driving at high speeds. While I know it's a pipe dream of mine, if I can build it to where I'm happy with it, it's on my bucket list to at least run the LCQ at King of the Hammers... or pre-qualify in a race around here. Running an ECORS event would be neat too. Also I have found I had a LOT more fun just building my Jeep vs wheeling it... which sucks because that's the expensive part:( So it's really just a new challenge for me. I still have a soft spot for leaves.

                  FWIW I have zero axle wrap which can be attributed to the traction bar.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    the ninja was being sarcastic.... google "revolver shackles" from the mid 90's.

                    x2 on flatlanders comment on good leaf setup bein better than incorrectly set up links
                    my next rig will be on the trail before zuk 2.0 will

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by tjrider View Post
                      So are you for or against? You've said both s:confused:ides.....
                      I think that was sarcasm(I hope it was?). Revolver shackles and 3/4 ellipticals are great for flexing out on an RTI ramp, but will unload and flop around like a fish in most cases.

                      http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1005604

                      Unlike regular leaves, if the body goes past the tipping point, revolver shackles will just let go and the body gains momentum and flops over sideways... normal leaves will gradually go from "compression" to "stretch" which helps with stability.

                      edit: yellowjacket beat me to it.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        So I found out that RC offers a long arm upgrade with arms only for $900. Not a bad price to me, and it will remain a four link. Thoughts?........
                        If you don't want it broke, don't let me drive it....

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by tjrider View Post
                          So I found out that RC offers a long arm upgrade with arms only for $900. Not a bad price to me, and it will remain a four link. Thoughts?........
                          It will be a 4 link with a pan hard bar, which is far from a triangulated 4 link that everyone talks about.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I know, but I don't want to cut the brackets off for a triangulated 4 link. Its standard 4 link. Has to be better than a SA kit.......
                            If you don't want it broke, don't let me drive it....

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by tjrider View Post
                              I know, but I don't want to cut the brackets off for a triangulated 4 link. Its standard 4 link. Has to be better than a SA kit.......
                              Does it have to be better? The kit is the cheapest bolt on long arm kit on the market, does that mean its good?

                              The joints on the RC stuff is known to wear out fast and you are going to put it on a daily driver. The kit is bolt on and uses bad geometry on the rear links to make it easy to install. Lots of people have troubles with suspension unloading and bad handling characteristics.

                              Why do you want a long arm? better flex? Cause you can get more than usable flex out of the factory short arm set up on a TJ. Here is mine with Currie arms and 12" travel shocks. If I went to long arms, I would just get hung up more on rocks and hate it.



                              I am not sure if this is fully flexed out but its the only picture I have right now.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                How much lift do you have? Is that SA front and rear? I know my factory arms don't flex that much.... mainly I want to get my wheel base back. My back tires aren't even centered in the wheel wells
                                If you don't want it broke, don't let me drive it....

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X