Quote:
Originally Posted by yellowjacket
Flatlander.
u said no probs with the 3.0s like with the smaller ones though?. Cause its the same, just bigger, rite? Mine are new, but the threads are really tite. Witch concerns me when I need to tighten them on a continuous basis, cause I know threads only get tougher after being under a trail rig for a season...
ive heard lots of bad news bout the inner washer like u said, too.... Gues ill try them, and replace as needed with jjs
|
The 3.0s have a "solid nylatron" race... which is NOW offered on the 2.63" joints... the 2.63s have half-hollow honeycomb sort of patterned race.... or used to anyway... enough people have *****ed about them sucking balls that it appears they are only offered with the solid races now.
Even still, I don't know if they've fixed the washers flexing issue or not, I wasted $320 on their joints once already... and $60 on their bushings which are poorly designed too... never again will I buy their ****.
I have no problems with the 3.0s... but they just take up WAY too much damn space... I will run 1.25" hiems in their place when I have to replace them too.
This is the TJ in question:
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-bird
Flatlander has a 2003 TJ with Dana 60/70. Rear has Cherokee leafs and the front it a 3 link. He was questioning that he might need more separation after the first joints went bad, but I am not sure what he has figured out since he installed the new joints.
|
Well I've beaten the heims senselessly much harder than I did with the Bull****astic 2.63" joints... and I've probably got about 2000 miles of street driving on the heims since the 2.63 joints were replaced... No play.